Agentic AI is developing fast. Agents are not just a tool; they are learning, adapting, and making decisions alongside us. Integrating Agents into teams is not just a technical challenge, it’s a cultural one. Teams need the space to experiment, the confidence to trust AI where it helps, and the right conditions to learn together. When adoption is thoughtful and inclusive, agentic AI can become a powerful extension of how teams think, decide, and deliver.
talk-data.com
Speaker
Aimee Reed
2
talks
Aimee Smith has dedicated almost a quarter of a century to the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). She began her career in 2001 as an Intelligence Analyst and by 2014, was leading the UK's largest Confidential Intelligence Unit. This led her to spearhead the MPS data transformation program. As he first Director of Data for the MPS, she established the inaugural Data Office in law enforcement in 2019. She volunteers to co-chair the National Police Data & Analytics Board, leading data initiatives across all forces. She advocates data cannot remain an underutilised valuable asset. Promoting openness and transparency for the public to police data, Aimee's passion and leadership continue to shape the future of data-driven policing. Aimee has a two children in primary school, two stepchildren, and a (brainy!) husband who is a Police Officer in Counter Terrorism.
Bio from: Big Data LDN 2025
Filter by Event / Source
Talks & appearances
2 activities · Newest first
“Data for Good” is about gathering insight, revealing injustice, and driving change. But what happens when the data we need most is missing - not because it’s hard to collect, but because it’s hard to face?
This talk explores the uncomfortable truth behind the Women’s Safety: that data on women’s safety - relating to male violence - is often absent not for technical reasons, but because it’s emotionally and socially fraught. Even among women working in data - people who understand the value of data and live with the reality of gendered harm - many chose not to complete the project’s survey. Their silence wasn’t apathy. It was a response to exhaustion, self-protection, and the emotional cost of revisiting experiences that are personal, painful, and too often ignored.
This session doesn’t ask how to collect more data. It asks how to make space for what’s already known but rarely spoken. How to recognise silence as meaningful. And how to place the responsibility for change on the institutions that are there to protect rather than the women who live the hidden reality.
What does it mean to do “data for good” when some truths stay silent?
Powered by Women in Data®