Summary In this episode of the Data Engineering Podcast Hannes Mühleisen and Mark Raasveldt, the creators of DuckDB, share their work on Duck Lake, a new entrant in the open lakehouse ecosystem. They discuss how Duck Lake, is focused on simplicity, flexibility, and offers a unified catalog and table format compared to other lakehouse formats like Iceberg and Delta. Hannes and Mark share insights into how Duck Lake revolutionizes data architecture by enabling local-first data processing, simplifying deployment of lakehouse solutions, and offering benefits such as encryption features, data inlining, and integration with existing ecosystems.

Announcements Hello and welcome to the Data Engineering Podcast, the show about modern data managementData teams everywhere face the same problem: they're forcing ML models, streaming data, and real-time processing through orchestration tools built for simple ETL. The result? Inflexible infrastructure that can't adapt to different workloads. That's why Cash App and Cisco rely on Prefect. Cash App's fraud detection team got what they needed - flexible compute options, isolated environments for custom packages, and seamless data exchange between workflows. Each model runs on the right infrastructure, whether that's high-memory machines or distributed compute. Orchestration is the foundation that determines whether your data team ships or struggles. ETL, ML model training, AI Engineering, Streaming - Prefect runs it all from ingestion to activation in one platform. Whoop and 1Password also trust Prefect for their data operations. If these industry leaders use Prefect for critical workflows, see what it can do for you at dataengineeringpodcast.com/prefect.Data migrations are brutal. They drag on for months—sometimes years—burning through resources and crushing team morale. Datafold's AI-powered Migration Agent changes all that. Their unique combination of AI code translation and automated data validation has helped companies complete migrations up to 10 times faster than manual approaches. And they're so confident in their solution, they'll actually guarantee your timeline in writing. Ready to turn your year-long migration into weeks? Visit dataengineeringpodcast.com/datafold today for the details. Your host is Tobias Macey and today I'm interviewing Hannes Mühleisen and Mark Raasveldt about DuckLake, the latest entrant into the open lakehouse ecosystemInterview IntroductionHow did you get involved in the area of data management?Can you describe what DuckLake is and the story behind it?What are the particular problems that DuckLake is solving for?How does this compare to the capabilities of MotherDuck?Iceberg and Delta already have a well established ecosystem, but so does DuckDB. Who are the primary personas that you are trying to focus on in these early days of DuckLake?One of the major factors driving the adoption of formats like Iceberg is cost efficiency for large volumes of data. That brings with it challenges of large batch processing of data. How does DuckLake account for these axes of scale?There is also a substantial investment in the ecosystem of technologies that support Iceberg. The most notable ecosystem challenge for DuckDB and DuckLake is in the query layer. How are you thinking about the evolution and growth of that capability beyond DuckDB (e.g. support in Trino/Spark/Flink)?What are your opinions on the viability of a future where DuckLake and Iceberg become a unified standard and implementation? (why can't Iceberg REST catalog implementations just use DuckLake under the hood?)Digging into the specifics of the specification and implementation, what are some of the capabilities that it offers above and beyond Iceberg?Is it now possible to enforce PK/FK constraints, indexing on underlying data?Given that DuckDB has a vector type, how do you think about the support for vector storage/indexing?How do the capabilities of DuckLake and the integration with DuckDB change the ways that data teams design their data architecture and access patterns?What are your thoughts on the impact of "data gravity" in today's data ecosystem, with engines like DuckDB, KuzuDB, LanceDB, etc. available for embedded and edge use cases?What are the most interesting, innovative, or unexpected ways that you have seen DuckLake used?What are the most interesting, unexpected, or challenging lessons that you have learned while working on DuckLake?When is DuckLake the wrong choice?What do you have planned for the future of DuckLake?Contact Info HannesWebsiteMarkWebsiteParting Question From your perspective, what is the biggest gap in the tooling or technology for data management today?Closing Announcements Thank you for listening! Don't forget to check out our other shows. Podcast.init covers the Python language, its community, and the innovative ways it is being used. The AI Engineering Podcast is your guide to the fast-moving world of building AI systems.Visit the site to subscribe to the show, sign up for the mailing list, and read the show notes.If you've learned something or tried out a project from the show then tell us about it! Email [email protected] with your story.Links DuckDBPodcast EpisodeDuckLakeDuckDB LabsMySQLCWIMonetDBIcebergIceberg REST CatalogDeltaHudiLanceDuckDB Iceberg ConnectorACID == Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, DurabilityMotherDuckMotherDuck Managed DuckLakeTrinoSparkPrestoSpark DuckLake DemoDelta KernelArrowdltS3 TablesAttribute Based Access Control (ABAC)ParquetArrow FlightHadoopHDFSDuckLake RoadmapThe intro and outro music is from The Hug by The Freak Fandango Orchestra / CC BY-SA

Summary In this episode of the Data Engineering Podcast Prashanth Rao, an AI engineer at KuzuDB, talks about their embeddable graph database. Prashanth explains how KuzuDB addresses performance shortcomings in existing solutions through columnar storage and novel join algorithms. He discusses the usability and scalability of KuzuDB, emphasizing its open-source nature and potential for various graph applications. The conversation explores the growing interest in graph databases due to their AI and data engineering applications, and Prashanth highlights KuzuDB's potential in edge computing, ephemeral workloads, and integration with other formats like Iceberg and Parquet.

Announcements Hello and welcome to the Data Engineering Podcast, the show about modern data managementData migrations are brutal. They drag on for months—sometimes years—burning through resources and crushing team morale. Datafold's AI-powered Migration Agent changes all that. Their unique combination of AI code translation and automated data validation has helped companies complete migrations up to 10 times faster than manual approaches. And they're so confident in their solution, they'll actually guarantee your timeline in writing. Ready to turn your year-long migration into weeks? Visit dataengineeringpodcast.com/datafold today for the details.Your host is Tobias Macey and today I'm interviewing Prashanth Rao about KuzuDB, an embeddable graph databaseInterview IntroductionHow did you get involved in the area of data management?Can you describe what KuzuDB is and the story behind it?What are the core use cases that Kuzu is focused on addressing?What is explicitly out of scope?Graph engines have been available and in use for a long time, but generally for more niche use cases. How would you characterize the current state of the graph data ecosystem?You note scalability as a feature of Kuzu, which is a phrase with many potential interpretations. Typically horizontal scaling of graphs has been complicated, in what sense does Kuzu make that claim?Can you describe some of the typical architecture and integration patterns of Kuzu?What are some of the more interesting or esoteric means of architecting with Kuzu?For cases where Kuzu is rendering a graph across an external data repository (e.g. Iceberg, etc.), what are the patterns for balancing data freshness with network/compute efficiency? (e.g. read and create every time or persist the Kuzu state)Can you describe the internal architecture of Kuzu and key design factors?What are the benefits and tradeoffs of using a columnar store with adjacency lists vs. a more graph-native storage format?What are the most interesting, innovative, or unexpected ways that you have seen Kuzu used?What are the most interesting, unexpected, or challenging lessons that you have learned while working on Kuzu?When is Kuzu the wrong choice?What do you have planned for the future of Kuzu?Contact Info WebsiteLinkedInParting Question From your perspective, what is the biggest gap in the tooling or technology for data management today?Links KuzuDBBERTTransformer ArchitectureDuckDBPodcast EpisodeMonetDBUmbra DBsqliteCypher Query LanguageProperty GraphNeo4JGraphRAGContext EngineeringWrite-Ahead LogBauplanIcebergDuckLakeLanceLanceDBArrowPolarsArrow DataFusionGQLClickHouseAdjacency ListWhy Graph Databases Need New Join AlgorithmsKuzuDB WASMRAG == Retrieval Augmented GenerationNetworkXThe intro and outro music is from The Hug by The Freak Fandango Orchestra / CC BY-SA

Summary In this episode of the Data Engineering Podcast Andy Warfield talks about the innovative functionalities of S3 Tables and Vectors and their integration into modern data stacks. Andy shares his journey through the tech industry and his role at Amazon, where he collaborates to enhance storage capabilities, discussing the evolution of S3 from a simple storage solution to a sophisticated system supporting advanced data types like tables and vectors crucial for analytics and AI-driven applications. He explains the motivations behind introducing S3 Tables and Vectors, highlighting their role in simplifying data management and enhancing performance for complex workloads, and shares insights into the technical challenges and design considerations involved in developing these features. The conversation explores potential applications of S3 Tables and Vectors in fields like AI, genomics, and media, and discusses future directions for S3's development to further support data-driven innovation.

Announcements Hello and welcome to the Data Engineering Podcast, the show about modern data managementTired of data migrations that drag on for months or even years? What if I told you there's a way to cut that timeline by up to 6x while guaranteeing accuracy? Datafold's Migration Agent is the only AI-powered solution that doesn't just translate your code; it validates every single data point to ensure perfect parity between your old and new systems. Whether you're moving from Oracle to Snowflake, migrating stored procedures to dbt, or handling complex multi-system migrations, they deliver production-ready code with a guaranteed timeline and fixed price. Stop burning budget on endless consulting hours. Visit dataengineeringpodcast.com/datafold to book a demo and see how they're turning months-long migration nightmares into week-long success stories.Your host is Tobias Macey and today I'm interviewing Andy Warfield about S3 Tables and VectorsInterview IntroductionHow did you get involved in the area of data management?Can you describe what your goals are with the Tables and Vector features of S3?How did the experience of building S3 Tables inform your work on S3 Vectors?There are numerous implementations of vector storage and search. How do you view the role of S3 in the context of that ecosystem?The most directly analogous implementation that I'm aware of is the Lance table format. How would you compare the implementation and capabilities of Lance with what you are building with S3 Vectors?What opportunity do you see for being able to offer a protocol compatible implementation similar to the Iceberg compatibility that you provide with S3 Tables?Can you describe the technical implementation of the Vectors functionality in S3?What are the sources of inspiration that you looked to in designing the service?Can you describe some of the ways that S3 Vectors might be integrated into a typical AI application?What are the most interesting, innovative, or unexpected ways that you have seen S3 Tables/Vectors used?What are the most interesting, unexpected, or challenging lessons that you have learned while working on S3 Tables/Vectors?When is S3 the wrong choice for Iceberg or Vector implementations?What do you have planned for the future of S3 Tables and Vectors?Contact Info LinkedInParting Question From your perspective, what is the biggest gap in the tooling or technology for data management today?Closing Announcements Thank you for listening! Don't forget to check out our other shows. Podcast.init covers the Python language, its community, and the innovative ways it is being used. The AI Engineering Podcast is your guide to the fast-moving world of building AI systems.Visit the site to subscribe to the show, sign up for the mailing list, and read the show notes.If you've learned something or tried out a project from the show then tell us about it! Email [email protected] with your story.Links S3 TablesS3 VectorsS3 ExpressParquetIcebergVector IndexVector DatabasepgvectorEmbedding ModelRetrieval Augmented GenerationTwelveLabsAmazon BedrockIceberg REST CatalogLog-Structured Merge TreeS3 MetadataSentence TransformerSparkTrinoDaftThe intro and outro music is from The Hug by The Freak Fandango Orchestra / CC BY-SA

Summary In this episode of the Data Engineering Podcast Alex Albu, tech lead for AI initiatives at Starburst, talks about integrating AI workloads with the lakehouse architecture. From his software engineering roots to leading data engineering efforts, Alex shares insights on enhancing Starburst's platform to support AI applications, including an AI agent for data exploration and using AI for metadata enrichment and workload optimization. He discusses the challenges of integrating AI with data systems, innovations like SQL functions for AI tasks and vector databases, and the limitations of traditional architectures in handling AI workloads. Alex also shares his vision for the future of Starburst, including support for new data formats and AI-driven data exploration tools.

Announcements Hello and welcome to the Data Engineering Podcast, the show about modern data managementData migrations are brutal. They drag on for months—sometimes years—burning through resources and crushing team morale. Datafold's AI-powered Migration Agent changes all that. Their unique combination of AI code translation and automated data validation has helped companies complete migrations up to 10 times faster than manual approaches. And they're so confident in their solution, they'll actually guarantee your timeline in writing. Ready to turn your year-long migration into weeks? Visit dataengineeringpodcast.com/datafold today for the details.This is a pharmaceutical Ad for Soda Data Quality. Do you suffer from chronic dashboard distrust? Are broken pipelines and silent schema changes wreaking havoc on your analytics? You may be experiencing symptoms of Undiagnosed Data Quality Syndrome — also known as UDQS. Ask your data team about Soda. With Soda Metrics Observability, you can track the health of your KPIs and metrics across the business — automatically detecting anomalies before your CEO does. It’s 70% more accurate than industry benchmarks, and the fastest in the category, analyzing 1.1 billion rows in just 64 seconds. And with Collaborative Data Contracts, engineers and business can finally agree on what “done” looks like — so you can stop fighting over column names, and start trusting your data again.Whether you’re a data engineer, analytics lead, or just someone who cries when a dashboard flatlines, Soda may be right for you. Side effects of implementing Soda may include: Increased trust in your metrics, reduced late-night Slack emergencies, spontaneous high-fives across departments, fewer meetings and less back-and-forth with business stakeholders, and in rare cases, a newfound love of data. Sign up today to get a chance to win a $1000+ custom mechanical keyboard. Visit dataengineeringpodcast.com/soda to sign up and follow Soda’s launch week. It starts June 9th. This episode is brought to you by Coresignal, your go-to source for high-quality public web data to power best-in-class AI products. Instead of spending time collecting, cleaning, and enriching data in-house, use ready-made multi-source B2B data that can be smoothly integrated into your systems via APIs or as datasets. With over 3 billion data records from 15+ online sources, Coresignal delivers high-quality data on companies, employees, and jobs. It is powering decision-making for more than 700 companies across AI, investment, HR tech, sales tech, and market intelligence industries. A founding member of the Ethical Web Data Collection Initiative, Coresignal stands out not only for its data quality but also for its commitment to responsible data collection practices. Recognized as the top data provider by Datarade for two consecutive years, Coresignal is the go-to partner for those who need fresh, accurate, and ethically sourced B2B data at scale. Discover how Coresignal's data can enhance your AI platforms. Visit dataengineeringpodcast.com/coresignal to start your free 14-day trial.Your host is Tobias Macey and today I'm interviewing Alex Albu about how Starburst is extending the lakehouse to support AI workloadsInterview IntroductionHow did you get involved in the area of data management?Can you start by outlining the interaction points of AI with the types of data workflows that you are supporting with Starburst?What are some of the limitations of warehouse and lakehouse systems when it comes to supporting AI systems?What are the points of friction for engineers who are trying to employ LLMs in the work of maintaining a lakehouse environment?Methods such as tool use (exemplified by MCP) are a means of bolting on AI models to systems like Trino. What are some of the ways that is insufficient or cumbersome?Can you describe the technical implementation of the AI-oriented features that you have incorporated into the Starburst platform?What are the foundational architectural modifications that you had to make to enable those capabilities?For the vector storage and indexing, what modifications did you have to make to iceberg?What was your reasoning for not using a format like Lance?For teams who are using Starburst and your new AI features, what are some examples of the workflows that they can expect?What new capabilities are enabled by virtue of embedding AI features into the interface to the lakehouse?What are the most interesting, innovative, or unexpected ways that you have seen Starburst AI features used?What are the most interesting, unexpected, or challenging lessons that you have learned while working on AI features for Starburst?When is Starburst/lakehouse the wrong choice for a given AI use case?What do you have planned for the future of AI on Starburst?Contact Info LinkedInParting Question From your perspective, what is the biggest gap in the tooling or technology for data management today?Closing Announcements Thank you for listening! Don't forget to check out our other shows. Podcast.init covers the Python language, its community, and the innovative ways it is being used. The AI Engineering Podcast is your guide to the fast-moving world of building AI systems.Visit the site to subscribe to the show, sign up for the mailing list, and read the show notes.If you've learned something or tried out a project from the show then tell us about it! Email [email protected] with your story.Links StarburstPodcast EpisodeAWS AthenaMCP == Model Context ProtocolLLM Tool UseVector EmbeddingsRAG == Retrieval Augmented GenerationAI Engineering Podcast EpisodeStarburst Data ProductsLanceLanceDBParquetORCpgvectorStarburst IcehouseThe intro and outro music is from The Hug by The Freak Fandango Orchestra / CC BY-SA

Summary In this episode of the Data Engineering Podcast Tulika Bhatt, a senior software engineer at Netflix, talks about her experiences with large-scale data processing and the future of data engineering technologies. Tulika shares her journey into the data engineering field, discussing her work at BlackRock and Verizon before joining Netflix, and explains the challenges and innovations involved in managing Netflix's impression data for personalization and user experience. She highlights the importance of balancing off-the-shelf solutions with custom-built systems using technologies like Spark, Flink, and Iceberg, and delves into the complexities of ensuring data quality and observability in high-speed environments, including robust alerting strategies and semantic data auditing.

Announcements Hello and welcome to the Data Engineering Podcast, the show about modern data managementData migrations are brutal. They drag on for months—sometimes years—burning through resources and crushing team morale. Datafold's AI-powered Migration Agent changes all that. Their unique combination of AI code translation and automated data validation has helped companies complete migrations up to 10 times faster than manual approaches. And they're so confident in their solution, they'll actually guarantee your timeline in writing. Ready to turn your year-long migration into weeks? Visit dataengineeringpodcast.com/datafold today for the details.Your host is Tobias Macey and today I'm interviewing Tulika Bhatt about her experiences working on large scale data processing and her insights on the future trajectory of the supporting technologiesInterview IntroductionHow did you get involved in the area of data management?Can you start by outlining the ways that operating at large scale change the ways that you need to think about the design of data systems?When dealing with small-scale data systems it can be feasible to have manual processes. What are the elements of large scal data systems that demand autopmation?How can those large-scale automation principles be down-scaled to the systems that the rest of the world are operating?A perennial problem in data engineering is that of data quality. The past 4 years has seen a significant growth in the number of tools and practices available for automating the validation and verification of data. In your experience working with high volume data flows, what are the elements of data validation that are still unsolved?Generative AI has taken the world by storm over the past couple years. How has that changed the ways that you approach your daily work?What do you see as the future realities of working with data across various axes of large scale, real-time, etc.?What are the most interesting, innovative, or unexpected ways that you have seen solutions to large-scale data management designed?What are the most interesting, unexpected, or challenging lessons that you have learned while working on data management across axes of scale?What are the ways that you are thinking about the future trajectory of your work??Contact Info LinkedInParting Question From your perspective, what is the biggest gap in the tooling or technology for data management today?Closing Announcements Thank you for listening! Don't forget to check out our other shows. Podcast.init covers the Python language, its community, and the innovative ways it is being used. The AI Engineering Podcast is your guide to the fast-moving world of building AI systems.Visit the site to subscribe to the show, sign up for the mailing list, and read the show notes.If you've learned something or tried out a project from the show then tell us about it! Email [email protected] with your story.Links BlackRockSparkFlinkKafkaCassandraRocksDBNetflix Maestro workflow orchestratorPagerdutyIcebergThe intro and outro music is from The Hug by The Freak Fandango Orchestra / CC BY-SA

Summary In this episode of the Data Engineering Podcast Sida Shen, product manager at CelerData, talks about StarRocks, a high-performance analytical database. Sida discusses the inception of StarRocks, which was forked from Apache Doris in 2020 and evolved into a high-performance Lakehouse query engine. He explains the architectural design of StarRocks, highlighting its capabilities in handling high concurrency and low latency queries, and its integration with open table formats like Apache Iceberg, Delta Lake, and Apache Hudi. Sida also discusses how StarRocks differentiates itself from other query engines by supporting on-the-fly joins and eliminating the need for denormalization pipelines, and shares insights into its use cases, such as customer-facing analytics and real-time data processing, as well as future directions for the platform.

Announcements Hello and welcome to the Data Engineering Podcast, the show about modern data managementData migrations are brutal. They drag on for months—sometimes years—burning through resources and crushing team morale. Datafold's AI-powered Migration Agent changes all that. Their unique combination of AI code translation and automated data validation has helped companies complete migrations up to 10 times faster than manual approaches. And they're so confident in their solution, they'll actually guarantee your timeline in writing. Ready to turn your year-long migration into weeks? Visit dataengineeringpodcast.com/datafold today for the details.Your host is Tobias Macey and today I'm interviewing Sida Shen about StarRocks, a high performance analytical database supporting shared nothing and shared data patternsInterview IntroductionHow did you get involved in the area of data management?Can you describe what StarRocks is and the story behind it?There are numerous analytical databases on the market. What are the attributes of StarRocks that differentiate it from other options?Can you describe the architecture of StarRocks?What are the "-ilities" that are foundational to the design of the system?How have the design and focus of the project evolved since it was first created?What are the tradeoffs involved in separating the communication layer from the data layers?The tiered architecture enables the shared nothing and shared data behaviors, which allows for the implementation of lakehouse patterns. What are some of the patterns that are possible due to the single interface/dual pattern nature of StarRocks?The shared data implementation has cacheing built in to accelerate interaction with datasets. What are some of the limitations/edge cases that operators and consumers should be aware of?StarRocks supports management of lakehouse tables (Iceberg, Delta, Hudi, etc.), which overlaps with use cases for Trino/Presto/Dremio/etc. What are the cases where StarRocks acts as a replacement for those systems vs. a supplement to them?The other major category of engines that StarRocks overlaps with is OLAP databases (e.g. Clickhouse, Firebolt, etc.). Why might someone use StarRocks in addition to or in place of those techologies?We would be remiss if we ignored the dominating trend of AI and the systems that support it. What is the role of StarRocks in the context of an AI application?What are the most interesting, innovative, or unexpected ways that you have seen StarRocks used?What are the most interesting, unexpected, or challenging lessons that you have learned while working on StarRocks?When is StarRocks the wrong choice?What do you have planned for the future of StarRocks?Contact Info LinkedInParting Question From your perspective, what is the biggest gap in the tooling or technology for data management today?Closing Announcements Thank you for listening! Don't forget to check out our other shows. Podcast.init covers the Python language, its community, and the innovative ways it is being used. The AI Engineering Podcast is your guide to the fast-moving world of building AI systems.Visit the site to subscribe to the show, sign up for the mailing list, and read the show notes.If you've learned something or tried out a project from the show then tell us about it! Email [email protected] with your story.Links StarRocksCelerDataApache DorisSIMD == Single Instruction Multiple DataApache IcebergClickHousePodcast EpisodeDruidFireboltPodcast EpisodeSnowflakeBigQueryTrinoDatabricksDremioData LakehouseDelta LakeApache HiveC++Cost-Based OptimizerIceberg Summit Tencent Games PresentationApache PaimonLancePodcast EpisodeDelta UniformApache ArrowStarRocks Python UDFDebeziumPodcast EpisodeThe intro and outro music is from The Hug by The Freak Fandango Orchestra / CC BY-SA

Summary In this episode of the Data Engineering Podcast Viktor Kessler, co-founder of Vakmo, talks about the architectural patterns in the lake house enabled by a fast and feature-rich Iceberg catalog. Viktor shares his journey from data warehouses to developing the open-source project, Lakekeeper, an Apache Iceberg REST catalog written in Rust that facilitates building lake houses with essential components like storage, compute, and catalog management. He discusses the importance of metadata in making data actionable, the evolution of data catalogs, and the challenges and innovations in the space, including integration with OpenFGA for fine-grained access control and managing data across formats and compute engines.

Announcements Hello and welcome to the Data Engineering Podcast, the show about modern data managementData migrations are brutal. They drag on for months—sometimes years—burning through resources and crushing team morale. Datafold's AI-powered Migration Agent changes all that. Their unique combination of AI code translation and automated data validation has helped companies complete migrations up to 10 times faster than manual approaches. And they're so confident in their solution, they'll actually guarantee your timeline in writing. Ready to turn your year-long migration into weeks? Visit dataengineeringpodcast.com/datafold today for the details.Your host is Tobias Macey and today I'm interviewing Viktor Kessler about architectural patterns in the lakehouse that are unlocked by a fast and feature-rich Iceberg catalogInterview IntroductionHow did you get involved in the area of data management?Can you describe what LakeKeeper is and the story behind it? What is the core of the problem that you are addressing?There has been a lot of activity in the catalog space recently. What are the driving forces that have highlighted the need for a better metadata catalog in the data lake/distributed data ecosystem?How would you characterize the feature sets/problem spaces that different entrants are focused on addressing?Iceberg as a table format has gained a lot of attention and adoption across the data ecosystem. The REST catalog format has opened the door for numerous implementations. What are the opportunities for innovation and improving user experience in that space?What is the role of the catalog in managing security and governance? (AuthZ, auditing, etc.)What are the channels for propagating identity and permissions to compute engines? (how do you avoid head-scratching about permission denied situations)Can you describe how LakeKeeper is implemented?How have the design and goals of the project changed since you first started working on it?For someone who has an existing set of Iceberg tables and catalog, what does the migration process look like?What new workflows or capabilities does LakeKeeper enable for data teams using Iceberg tables across one or more compute frameworks?What are the most interesting, innovative, or unexpected ways that you have seen LakeKeeper used?What are the most interesting, unexpected, or challenging lessons that you have learned while working on LakeKeeper?When is LakeKeeper the wrong choice?What do you have planned for the future of LakeKeeper?Contact Info LinkedInParting Question From your perspective, what is the biggest gap in the tooling or technology for data management today?Closing Announcements Thank you for listening! Don't forget to check out our other shows. Podcast.init covers the Python language, its community, and the innovative ways it is being used. The AI Engineering Podcast is your guide to the fast-moving world of building AI systems.Visit the site to subscribe to the show, sign up for the mailing list, and read the show notes.If you've learned something or tried out a project from the show then tell us about it! Email [email protected] with your story.Links LakeKeeperSAPMicrosoft AccessMicrosoft ExcelApache IcebergPodcast EpisodeIceberg REST CatalogPyIcebergSparkTrinoDremioHive MetastoreHadoopNATSPolarsDuckDBPodcast EpisodeDataFusionAtlanPodcast EpisodeOpen MetadataPodcast EpisodeApache AtlasOpenFGAHudiPodcast EpisodeDelta LakePodcast EpisodeLance Table FormatPodcast EpisodeUnity CatalogPolaris CatalogApache GravitinoPodcast Episode KeycloakOpen Policy Agent (OPA)Apache RangerApache NiFiThe intro and outro music is from The Hug by The Freak Fandango Orchestra / CC BY-SA

Summary In this episode of the Data Engineering Podcast Rajan Goyal, CEO and co-founder of Datapelago, talks about improving efficiencies in data processing by reimagining system architecture. Rajan explains the shift from hyperconverged to disaggregated and composable infrastructure, highlighting the importance of accelerated computing in modern data centers. He discusses the evolution from proprietary to open, composable stacks, emphasizing the role of open table formats and the need for a universal data processing engine, and outlines Datapelago's strategy to leverage existing frameworks like Spark and Trino while providing accelerated computing benefits.

Announcements Hello and welcome to the Data Engineering Podcast, the show about modern data managementData migrations are brutal. They drag on for months—sometimes years—burning through resources and crushing team morale. Datafold's AI-powered Migration Agent changes all that. Their unique combination of AI code translation and automated data validation has helped companies complete migrations up to 10 times faster than manual approaches. And they're so confident in their solution, they'll actually guarantee your timeline in writing. Ready to turn your year-long migration into weeks? Visit dataengineeringpodcast.com/datafold today for the details.Your host is Tobias Macey and today I'm interviewing Rajan Goyal about how to drastically improve efficiencies in data processing by re-imagining the system architectureInterview IntroductionHow did you get involved in the area of data management?Can you start by outlining the main factors that contribute to performance challenges in data lake environments?The different components of open data processing systems have evolved from different starting points with different objectives. In your experience, how has that un-planned and un-synchronized evolution of the ecosystem hindered the capabilities and adoption of open technologies?The introduction of a new cross-cutting capability (e.g. Iceberg) has typically taken a substantial amount of time to gain support across different engines and ecosystems. What do you see as the point of highest leverage to improve the capabilities of the entire stack with the least amount of co-ordination?What was the motivating insight that led you to invest in the technology that powers Datapelago?Can you describe the system design of Datapelago and how it integrates with existing data engines?The growth in the generation and application of unstructured data is a notable shift in the work being done by data teams. What are the areas of overlap in the fundamental nature of data (whether structured, semi-structured, or unstructured) that you are able to exploit to bridge the processing gap?What are the most interesting, innovative, or unexpected ways that you have seen Datapelago used?What are the most interesting, unexpected, or challenging lessons that you have learned while working on Datapelago?When is Datapelago the wrong choice?What do you have planned for the future of Datapelago?Contact Info LinkedInParting Question From your perspective, what is the biggest gap in the tooling or technology for data management today?Links DatapelagoMIPS ArchitectureARM ArchitectureAWS NitroMellanoxNvidiaVon Neumann ArchitectureTPU == Tensor Processing UnitFPGA == Field-Programmable Gate ArraySparkTrinoIcebergPodcast EpisodeDelta LakePodcast EpisodeHudiPodcast EpisodeApache GlutenIntermediate RepresentationTuring CompletenessLLVMAmdahl's LawLSTM == Long Short-Term MemoryThe intro and outro music is from The Hug by The Freak Fandango Orchestra / CC BY-SA

In this episode, I had the pleasure of speaking with Ken Pickering, VP of Engineering at Going, about the intricacies of streaming data into a Trino and Iceberg lakehouse. Ken shared his journey from product engineering to becoming deeply involved in data-centric roles, highlighting his experiences in ecommerce and InsurTech. At Going, Ken leads the data platform team, focusing on finding travel deals for consumers, a task that involves handling massive volumes of flight data and event stream information.

Ken explained the dual approach of passive and active search strategies used by Going to manage the vast data landscape. Passive search involves aggregating data from global distribution systems, while active search is more transactional, querying specific flight prices. This approach helps Going sift through approximately 50 petabytes of data annually to identify the best travel deals.

We delved into the technical architecture supporting these operations, including the use of Confluent for data streaming, Starburst Galaxy for transformation, and Databricks for modeling. Ken emphasized the importance of an open lakehouse architecture, which allows for flexibility and scalability as the business grows.

Ken also discussed the composition of Going's engineering and data teams, highlighting the collaborative nature of their work and the reliance on vendor tooling to streamline operations. He shared insights into the challenges and strategies of managing data life cycles, ensuring data quality, and maintaining uptime for consumer-facing applications.

Throughout our conversation, Ken provided a glimpse into the future of Going's data architecture, including potential expansions into other travel modes and the integration of large language models for enhanced customer interaction. This episode offers a comprehensive look at the complexities and innovations in building a data-driven travel advisory service.

Summary In this episode of the Data Engineering Podcast, the creators of Feldera talk about their incremental compute engine designed for continuous computation of data, machine learning, and AI workloads. The discussion covers the concept of incremental computation, the origins of Feldera, and its unique ability to handle both streaming and batch data seamlessly. The guests explore Feldera's architecture, applications in real-time machine learning and AI, and challenges in educating users about incremental computation. They also discuss the balance between open-source and enterprise offerings, and the broader implications of incremental computation for the future of data management, predicting a shift towards unified systems that handle both batch and streaming data efficiently.

Announcements Hello and welcome to the Data Engineering Podcast, the show about modern data managementImagine catching data issues before they snowball into bigger problems. That’s what Datafold’s new Monitors do. With automatic monitoring for cross-database data diffs, schema changes, key metrics, and custom data tests, you can catch discrepancies and anomalies in real time, right at the source. Whether it’s maintaining data integrity or preventing costly mistakes, Datafold Monitors give you the visibility and control you need to keep your entire data stack running smoothly. Want to stop issues before they hit production? Learn more at dataengineeringpodcast.com/datafold today!As a listener of the Data Engineering Podcast you clearly care about data and how it affects your organization and the world. For even more perspective on the ways that data impacts everything around us you should listen to Data Citizens® Dialogues, the forward-thinking podcast from the folks at Collibra. You'll get further insights from industry leaders, innovators, and executives in the world's largest companies on the topics that are top of mind for everyone. They address questions around AI governance, data sharing, and working at global scale. In particular I appreciate the ability to hear about the challenges that enterprise scale businesses are tackling in this fast-moving field. While data is shaping our world, Data Citizens Dialogues is shaping the conversation. Subscribe to Data Citizens Dialogues on Apple, Spotify, Youtube, or wherever you get your podcasts.Your host is Tobias Macey and today I'm interviewing Leonid Ryzhyk, Lalith Suresh, and Mihai Budiu about Feldera, an incremental compute engine for continous computation of data, ML, and AI workloadsInterview IntroductionCan you describe what Feldera is and the story behind it?DBSP (the theory behind Feldera) has won multiple awards from the database research community. Can you explain what it is and how it solves the incremental computation problem?Depending on which angle you look at it, Feldera has attributes of data warehouses, federated query engines, and stream processors. What are the unique use cases that Feldera is designed to address?In what situations would you replace another technology with Feldera?When is it an additive technology?Can you describe the architecture of Feldera?How have the design and scope evolved since you first started working on it?What are the state storage interfaces available in Feldera?What are the opportunities for integrating with or building on top of open table formats like Iceberg, Lance, Hudi, etc.?Can you describe a typical workflow for an engineer building with Feldera?You advertise Feldera's utility in ML and AI use cases in addition to data management. What are the features that make it conducive to those applications?What is your philosophy toward the community growth and engagement with the open source aspects of Feldera and how you're balancing that with sustainability of the project and business?What are the most interesting, innovative, or unexpected ways that you have seen Feldera used?What are the most interesting, unexpected, or challenging lessons that

Summary The rapid growth of generative AI applications has prompted a surge of investment in vector databases. While there are numerous engines available now, Lance is designed to integrate with data lake and lakehouse architectures. In this episode Weston Pace explains the inner workings of the Lance format for table definitions and file storage, and the optimizations that they have made to allow for fast random access and efficient schema evolution. In addition to integrating well with data lakes, Lance is also a first-class participant in the Arrow ecosystem, making it easy to use with your existing ML and AI toolchains. This is a fascinating conversation about a technology that is focused on expanding the range of options for working with vector data. Announcements Hello and welcome to the Data Engineering Podcast, the show about modern data managementImagine catching data issues before they snowball into bigger problems. That’s what Datafold’s new Monitors do. With automatic monitoring for cross-database data diffs, schema changes, key metrics, and custom data tests, you can catch discrepancies and anomalies in real time, right at the source. Whether it’s maintaining data integrity or preventing costly mistakes, Datafold Monitors give you the visibility and control you need to keep your entire data stack running smoothly. Want to stop issues before they hit production? Learn more at dataengineeringpodcast.com/datafold today!Your host is Tobias Macey and today I'm interviewing Weston Pace about the Lance file and table format for column-oriented vector storageInterview IntroductionHow did you get involved in the area of data management?Can you describe what Lance is and the story behind it?What are the core problems that Lance is designed to solve?What is explicitly out of scope?The README mentions that it is straightforward to convert to Lance from Parquet. What is the motivation for this compatibility/conversion support?What formats does Lance replace or obviate?In terms of data modeling Lance obviously adds a vector type, what are the features and constraints that engineers should be aware of when modeling their embeddings or arbitrary vectors?Are there any practical or hard limitations on vector dimensionality?When generating Lance files/datasets, what are some considerations to be aware of for balancing file/chunk sizes for I/O efficiency and random access in cloud storage?I noticed that the file specification has space for feature flags. How has that aided in enabling experimentation in new capabilities and optimizations?What are some of the engineering and design decisions that were most challenging and/or had the biggest impact on the performance and utility of Lance?The most obvious interface for reading and writing Lance files is through LanceDB. Can you describe the use cases that it focuses on and its notable features?What are the other main integrations for Lance?What are the opportunities or roadblocks in adding support for Lance and vector storage/indexes in e.g. Iceberg or Delta to enable its use in data lake environments?What are the most interesting, innovative, or unexpected ways that you have seen Lance used?What are the most interesting, unexpected, or challenging lessons that you have learned while working on the Lance format?When is Lance the wrong choice?What do you have planned for the future of Lance?Contact Info LinkedInGitHubParting Question From your perspective, what is the biggest gap in the tooling or technology for data management today?Links Lance FormatLanceDBSubstraitPyArrowFAISSPineconePodcast EpisodeParquetIcebergPodcast EpisodeDelta LakePodcast EpisodePyLanceHilbert CurvesSIFT VectorsS3 ExpressWekaDataFusionRay DataTorch Data LoaderHNSW == Hierarchical Navigable Small Worlds vector indexIVFPQ vector indexGeoJSONPolarsThe intro and outro music is from The Hug by The Freak Fandango Orchestra / CC BY-SA

Summary In this episode of the Data Engineering Podcast, host Tobias Macey welcomes back Chris Berg, CEO of DataKitchen, to discuss his ongoing mission to simplify the lives of data engineers. Chris explains the challenges faced by data engineers, such as constant system failures, the need for rapid changes, and high customer demands. Chris delves into the concept of DataOps, its evolution, and the misappropriation of related terms like data mesh and data observability. He emphasizes the importance of focusing on processes and systems rather than just tools to improve data engineering workflows. Chris also introduces DataKitchen's open-source tools, DataOps TestGen and DataOps Observability, designed to automate data quality validation and monitor data journeys in production. Announcements Hello and welcome to the Data Engineering Podcast, the show about modern data managementData lakes are notoriously complex. For data engineers who battle to build and scale high quality data workflows on the data lake, Starburst is an end-to-end data lakehouse platform built on Trino, the query engine Apache Iceberg was designed for, with complete support for all table formats including Apache Iceberg, Hive, and Delta Lake. Trusted by teams of all sizes, including Comcast and Doordash. Want to see Starburst in action? Go to dataengineeringpodcast.com/starburst and get $500 in credits to try Starburst Galaxy today, the easiest and fastest way to get started using Trino.Your host is Tobias Macey and today I'm interviewing Chris Bergh about his tireless quest to simplify the lives of data engineersInterview IntroductionHow did you get involved in the area of data management?Can you describe what DataKitchen is and the story behind it?You helped to define and popularize "DataOps", which then went through a journey of misappropriation similar to "DevOps", and has since faded in use. What is your view on the realities of "DataOps" today?Out of the popularized wave of "DataOps" tools came subsequent trends in data observability, data reliability engineering, etc. How have those cycles influenced the way that you think about the work that you are doing at DataKitchen?The data ecosystem went through a massive growth period over the past ~7 years, and we are now entering a cycle of consolidation. What are the fundamental shifts that we have gone through as an industry in the management and application of data?What are the challenges that never went away?You recently open sourced the dataops-testgen and dataops-observability tools. What are the outcomes that you are trying to produce with those projects?What are the areas of overlap with existing tools and what are the unique capabilities that you are offering?Can you talk through the technical implementation of your new obserability and quality testing platform?What does the onboarding and integration process look like?Once a team has one or both tools set up, what are the typical points of interaction that they will have over the course of their workday?What are the most interesting, innovative, or unexpected ways that you have seen dataops-observability/testgen used?What are the most interesting, unexpected, or challenging lessons that you have learned while working on promoting DataOps?What do you have planned for the future of your work at DataKitchen?Contact Info LinkedInParting Question From your perspective, what is the biggest gap in the tooling or technology for data management today?Links DataKitchenPodcast EpisodeNASADataOps ManifestoData Reliability EngineeringData ObservabilitydbtDevOps Enterprise SummitBuilding The Data Warehouse by Bill Inmon (affiliate link)dataops-testgen, dataops-observabilityFree Data Quality and Data Observability CertificationDatabricksDORA MetricsDORA for dataThe intro and outro music is from The Hug by The Freak Fandango Orchestra / CC BY-SA

Summary Data contracts are both an enforcement mechanism for data quality, and a promise to downstream consumers. In this episode Tom Baeyens returns to discuss the purpose and scope of data contracts, emphasizing their importance in achieving reliable analytical data and preventing issues before they arise. He explains how data contracts can be used to enforce guarantees and requirements, and how they fit into the broader context of data observability and quality monitoring. The discussion also covers the challenges and benefits of implementing data contracts, the organizational impact, and the potential for standardization in the field.

Announcements Hello and welcome to the Data Engineering Podcast, the show about modern data managementData lakes are notoriously complex. For data engineers who battle to build and scale high quality data workflows on the data lake, Starburst is an end-to-end data lakehouse platform built on Trino, the query engine Apache Iceberg was designed for, with complete support for all table formats including Apache Iceberg, Hive, and Delta Lake. Trusted by teams of all sizes, including Comcast and Doordash. Want to see Starburst in action? Go to dataengineeringpodcast.com/starburst and get $500 in credits to try Starburst Galaxy today, the easiest and fastest way to get started using Trino.At Outshift, the incubation engine from Cisco, they are driving innovation in AI, cloud, and quantum technologies with the powerful combination of enterprise strength and startup agility. Their latest innovation for the AI ecosystem is Motific, addressing a critical gap in going from prototype to production with generative AI. Motific is your vendor and model-agnostic platform for building safe, trustworthy, and cost-effective generative AI solutions in days instead of months. Motific provides easy integration with your organizational data, combined with advanced, customizable policy controls and observability to help ensure compliance throughout the entire process. Move beyond the constraints of traditional AI implementation and ensure your projects are launched quickly and with a firm foundation of trust and efficiency. Go to motific.ai today to learn more!Your host is Tobias Macey and today I'm interviewing Tom Baeyens about using data contracts to build a clearer API for your dataInterview IntroductionHow did you get involved in the area of data management?Can you describe the scope and purpose of data contracts in the context of this conversation?In what way(s) do they differ from data quality/data observability?Data contracts are also known as the API for data, can you elaborate on this?What are the types of guarantees and requirements that you can enforce with these data contracts?What are some examples of constraints or guarantees that cannot be represented in these contracts?Are data contracts related to the shift-left?Data contracts are also known as the API for data, can you elaborate on this?The obvious application of data contracts are in the context of pipeline execution flows to prevent failing checks from propagating further in the data flow. What are some of the other ways that these contracts can be integrated into an organization's data ecosystem?How did you approach the design of the syntax and implementation for Soda's data contracts?Guarantees and constraints around data in different contexts have been implemented in numerous tools and systems. What are the areas of overlap in e.g. dbt, great expectations?Are there any emerging standards or design patterns around data contracts/guarantees that will help encourage portability and integration across tooling/platform contexts?What are the most interesting, innovative, or unexpected ways that you have seen data contracts used?What are the most interesting, unexpected, or challenging lessons that you have learned while working on data contracts at Soda?When are data contracts the wrong choice?What do you have planned for the future of data contracts?Contact Info LinkedInParting Question From your perspective, what is the biggest gap in the tooling or technology for data management today?Closing Announcements Thank you for listening! Don't forget to check out our other shows. Podcast.init covers the Python language, its community, and the innovative ways it is being used. The AI Engineering Podcast is your guide to the fast-moving world of building AI systems.Visit the site to subscribe to the show, sign up for the mailing list, and read the show notes.If you've learned something or tried out a project from the show then tell us about it! Email [email protected] with your story.Links SodaPodcast EpisodeJBossData ContractAirflowUnit TestingIntegration TestingOpenAPIGraphQLCircuit Breaker PatternSodaCLSoda Data ContractsData MeshGreat Expectationsdbt Unit TestsOpen Data ContractsODCS == Open Data Contract StandardODPS == Open Data Product SpecificationThe intro and outro music is from The Hug by The Freak Fandango Orchestra / CC BY-SA

Summary Generative AI has rapidly gained adoption for numerous use cases. To support those applications, organizational data platforms need to add new features and data teams have increased responsibility. In this episode Lior Gavish, co-founder of Monte Carlo, discusses the various ways that data teams are evolving to support AI powered features and how they are incorporating AI into their work. Announcements Hello and welcome to the Data Engineering Podcast, the show about modern data managementData lakes are notoriously complex. For data engineers who battle to build and scale high quality data workflows on the data lake, Starburst is an end-to-end data lakehouse platform built on Trino, the query engine Apache Iceberg was designed for, with complete support for all table formats including Apache Iceberg, Hive, and Delta Lake. Trusted by teams of all sizes, including Comcast and Doordash. Want to see Starburst in action? Go to dataengineeringpodcast.com/starburst and get $500 in credits to try Starburst Galaxy today, the easiest and fastest way to get started using Trino.Your host is Tobias Macey and today I'm interviewing Lior Gavish about the impact of AI on data engineersInterview IntroductionHow did you get involved in the area of data management?Can you start by clarifying what we are discussing when we say "AI"?Previous generations of machine learning (e.g. deep learning, reinforcement learning, etc.) required new features in the data platform. What new demands is the current generation of AI introducing?Generative AI also has the potential to be incorporated in the creation/execution of data pipelines. What are the risk/reward tradeoffs that you have seen in practice?What are the areas where LLMs have proven useful/effective in data engineering?Vector embeddings have rapidly become a ubiquitous data format as a result of the growth in retrieval augmented generation (RAG) for AI applications. What are the end-to-end operational requirements to support this use case effectively?As with all data, the reliability and quality of the vectors will impact the viability of the AI application. What are the different failure modes/quality metrics/error conditions that they are subject to?As much as vectors, vector databases, RAG, etc. seem exotic and new, it is all ultimately shades of the same work that we have been doing for years. What are the areas of overlap in the work required for running the current generation of AI, and what are the areas where it diverges?What new skills do data teams need to acquire to be effective in supporting AI applications?What are the most interesting, innovative, or unexpected ways that you have seen AI impact data engineering teams?What are the most interesting, unexpected, or challenging lessons that you have learned while working with the current generation of AI?When is AI the wrong choice?What are your predictions for the future impact of AI on data engineering teams?Contact Info LinkedInParting Question From your perspective, what is the biggest gap in the tooling or technology for data management today?Closing Announcements Thank you for listening! Don't forget to check out our other shows. Podcast.init covers the Python language, its community, and the innovative ways it is being used. The AI Engineering Podcast is your guide to the fast-moving world of building AI systems.Visit the site to subscribe to the show, sign up for the mailing list, and read the show notes.If you've learned something or tried out a project from the show then tell us about it! Email [email protected] with your Links Monte CarloPodcast EpisodeNLP == Natural Language ProcessingLarge Language ModelsGenerative AIMLOpsML EngineerFeature StoreRetrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)LangchainThe intro and outro music is from The Hug by The Freak Fandango Orchestra / CC BY-SA

Summary In this episode Praveen Gujar, Director of Product at LinkedIn, talks about the intricacies of product management for data and analytical platforms. Praveen shares his journey from Amazon to Twitter and now LinkedIn, highlighting his extensive experience in building data products and platforms, digital advertising, AI, and cloud services. He discusses the evolving role of product managers in data-centric environments, emphasizing the importance of clean, reliable, and compliant data. Praveen also delves into the challenges of building scalable data platforms, the need for organizational and cultural alignment, and the critical role of product managers in bridging the gap between engineering and business teams. He provides insights into the complexities of platformization, the significance of long-term planning, and the necessity of having a strong relationship with engineering teams. The episode concludes with Praveen offering advice for aspiring product managers and discussing the future of data management in the context of AI and regulatory compliance.

Announcements Hello and welcome to the Data Engineering Podcast, the show about modern data managementData lakes are notoriously complex. For data engineers who battle to build and scale high quality data workflows on the data lake, Starburst is an end-to-end data lakehouse platform built on Trino, the query engine Apache Iceberg was designed for, with complete support for all table formats including Apache Iceberg, Hive, and Delta Lake. Trusted by teams of all sizes, including Comcast and Doordash. Want to see Starburst in action? Go to dataengineeringpodcast.com/starburst and get $500 in credits to try Starburst Galaxy today, the easiest and fastest way to get started using Trino.Your host is Tobias Macey and today I'm interviewing Praveen Gujar about product management for data and analytical platformsInterview IntroductionHow did you get involved in the area of data management?Product management is typically thought of as being oriented toward customer facing functionality and features. What is involved in being a product manager for data systems?Many data-oriented products that are customer facing require substantial technical capacity to serve those use cases. How does that influence the process of determining what features to provide/create?investment in technical capacity/platformsidentifying groupings of features that can be served by a common platform investmentmanaging organizational pressures between engineering, product, business, finance, etc.What are the most interesting, innovative, or unexpected ways that you have seen "Data Products & Platforms @ Big-tech" used?What are the most interesting, unexpected, or challenging lessons that you have learned while working on "Building Data Products & Platforms for Big-tech"?When is "Data Products & Platforms @ Big-tech" the wrong choice?What do you have planned for the future of "Data Products & Platforms @ Big-tech"?Contact Info LinkedInWebsiteParting Question From your perspective, what is the biggest gap in the tooling or technology for data management today?Closing Announcements Thank you for listening! Don't forget to check out our other shows. Podcast.init covers the Python language, its community, and the innovative ways it is being used. The AI Engineering Podcast is your guide to the fast-moving world of building AI systems.Visit the site to subscribe to the show, sign up for the mailing list, and read the show notes.If you've learned something or tried out a project from the show then tell us about it! Email [email protected] with your story.Links DataHubPodcast EpisodeRAG == Retrieval Augmented GenerationThe intro and outro music is from The Hug by The Freak Fandango Orchestra / CC BY-SA

Summary Postgres is one of the most widely respected and liked database engines ever. To make it even easier to use for developers to use, Nikita Shamgunov decided to makee it serverless, so that it can scale from zero to infinity. In this episode he explains the engineering involved to make that possible, as well as the numerous details that he and his team are packing into the Neon service to make it even more attractive for anyone who wants to build on top of Postgres. Announcements Hello and welcome to the Data Engineering Podcast, the show about modern data managementData lakes are notoriously complex. For data engineers who battle to build and scale high quality data workflows on the data lake, Starburst is an end-to-end data lakehouse platform built on Trino, the query engine Apache Iceberg was designed for, with complete support for all table formats including Apache Iceberg, Hive, and Delta Lake. Trusted by teams of all sizes, including Comcast and Doordash. Want to see Starburst in action? Go to dataengineeringpodcast.com/starburst and get $500 in credits to try Starburst Galaxy today, the easiest and fastest way to get started using Trino.Your host is Tobias Macey and today I'm interviewing Nikita Shamgunov about his work on making Postgres a serverless database at Neon.Interview IntroductionHow did you get involved in the area of data management?Can you describe what Neon is and the story behind it?The ecosystem around Postgres is large and varied. What are the pain points that you are trying to address with Neon? What does it mean for a database to be serverless?What kinds of products and services are unlocked by making Postgres a serverless database?How does your vision for Neon compare/contrast with what you know of PlanetScale?Postgres is known for having a large ecosystem of plugins that add a lot of interesting and useful features, but the storage layer has not been as easily extensible historically. How have architectural changes in recent Postgres releases enabled your work on Neon?What are the core pieces of engineering that you have had to complete to make Neon possible?How have the design and goals of the project evolved since you first started working on it?The separation of storage and compute is one of the most fundamental promises of the cloud. What new capabilities does that enable in Postgres?How does the branching functionality change the ways that development teams are able to deliver and debug features?Because the storage is now a networked system, what new performance/latency challenges does that introduce? How have you addressed them in Neon?Anyone who has ever operated a Postgres instance has had to tackle the upgrade process. How does Neon address that process for end users?The rampant growth of AI has touched almost every aspect of computing, and Postgres is no exception. How does the introduction of pgvector and semantic/similarity search functionality impact the adoption and usage patterns of Postgres/Neon?What new challenges does that introduce for you as an operator and business owner?What are the lessons that you learned from MemSQL/SingleStore that have been most helpful in your work at Neon?What are the most interesting, innovative, or unexpected ways that you have seen Neon used?What are the most interesting, unexpected, or challenging lessons that you have learned while working on Neon?When is Neon the wrong choice? Postgres?What do you have planned for the future of Neon?Contact Info @nikitabase on TwitterLinkedInParting Question From your perspective, what is the biggest gap in the tooling or technology for data management today?Closing Announcements Thank you for listening! Don't forget to check out our other shows. Podcast.init covers the Python language, its community, and the innovative ways it is being used. The Machine Learning Podcast helps you go from idea to production with machine learning.Visit the site to subscribe to the show, sign up for the mailing list, and read the show notes.If you've learned something or tried out a project from the show then tell us about it! Email [email protected] with your story.Links NeonPostgreSQLNeon GithubPHPMySQLSQL ServerSingleStorePodcast EpisodeAWS AuroraKhosla VenturesYugabyteDBPodcast EpisodeCockroachDBPodcast EpisodePlanetScalePodcast EpisodeClickhousePodcast EpisodeDuckDBPodcast EpisodeWAL == Write-Ahead LogPgBouncerPureStoragePaxos)HNSW IndexIVF Flat IndexRAG == Retrieval Augmented GenerationAlloyDBNeon Serverless DriverDevinmagic.devThe intro and outro music is from The Hug by The Freak Fandango Orchestra / CC BY-SA

Summary This episode features an insightful conversation with Petr Janda, the CEO and founder of Synq. Petr shares his journey from being an engineer to founding Synq, emphasizing the importance of treating data systems with the same rigor as engineering systems. He discusses the challenges and solutions in data reliability, including the need for transparency and ownership in data systems. Synq's platform helps data teams manage incidents, understand data dependencies, and ensure data quality by providing insights and automation capabilities. Petr emphasizes the need for a holistic approach to data reliability, integrating data systems into broader business processes. He highlights the role of data teams in modern organizations and how Synq is empowering them to achieve this. Announcements Hello and welcome to the Data Engineering Podcast, the show about modern data managementData lakes are notoriously complex. For data engineers who battle to build and scale high quality data workflows on the data lake, Starburst is an end-to-end data lakehouse platform built on Trino, the query engine Apache Iceberg was designed for, with complete support for all table formats including Apache Iceberg, Hive, and Delta Lake. Trusted by teams of all sizes, including Comcast and Doordash. Want to see Starburst in action? Go to dataengineeringpodcast.com/starburst and get $500 in credits to try Starburst Galaxy today, the easiest and fastest way to get started using Trino.Your host is Tobias Macey and today I'm interviewing Petr Janda about Synq, a data reliability platform focused on leveling up data teams by supporting a culture of engineering rigorInterview IntroductionHow did you get involved in the area of data management?Can you describe what Synq is and the story behind it? Data observability/reliability is a category that grew rapidly over the past ~5 years and has several vendors focused on different elements of the problem. What are the capabilities that you saw as lacking in the ecosystem which you are looking to address?Operational/infrastructure engineers have spent the past decade honing their approach to incident management and uptime commitments. How do those concepts map to the responsibilities and workflows of data teams? Tooling only plays a small part in SLAs and incident management. How does Synq help to support the cultural transformation that is necessary?What does an on-call rotation for a data engineer/data platform engineer look like as compared with an application-focused team?How does the focus on data assets/data products shift your approach to observability as compared to a table/pipeline centric approach?With the focus on sharing ownership beyond the boundaries on the data team there is a strong correlation with data governance principles. How do you see organizations incorporating Synq into their approach to data governance/compliance?Can you describe how Synq is designed/implemented? How have the scope and goals of the product changed since you first started working on it?For a team who is onboarding onto Synq, what are the steps required to get it integrated into their technology stack and workflows?What are the types of incidents/errors that you are able to identify and alert on? What does a typical incident/error resolution process look like with Synq?What are the most interesting, innovative, or unexpected ways that you have seen Synq used?What are the most interesting, unexpected, or challenging lessons that you have learned while working on Synq?When is Synq the wrong choice?What do you have planned for the future of Synq?Contact Info LinkedInSubstackParting Question From your perspective, what is the biggest gap in the tooling or technology for data management today?Closing Announcements Thank you for listening! Don't forget to check out our other shows. Podcast.init covers the Python language, its community, and the innovative ways it is being used. The Machine Learning Podcast helps you go from idea to production with machine learning.Visit the site to subscribe to the show, sign up for the mailing list, and read the show notes.If you've learned something or tried out a project from the show then tell us about it! Email [email protected] with your story.Links SynqIncident ManagementSLA == Service Level AgreementData GovernancePodcast EpisodePagerDutyOpsGenieClickhousePodcast EpisodedbtPodcast EpisodeSQLMeshPodcast EpisodeThe intro and outro music is from The Hug by The Freak Fandango Orchestra / CC BY-SA

Summary

Data lakehouse architectures have been gaining significant adoption. To accelerate adoption in the enterprise Microsoft has created the Fabric platform, based on their OneLake architecture. In this episode Dipti Borkar shares her experiences working on the product team at Fabric and explains the various use cases for the Fabric service.

Announcements

Hello and welcome to the Data Engineering Podcast, the show about modern data management Data lakes are notoriously complex. For data engineers who battle to build and scale high quality data workflows on the data lake, Starburst is an end-to-end data lakehouse platform built on Trino, the query engine Apache Iceberg was designed for, with complete support for all table formats including Apache Iceberg, Hive, and Delta Lake. Trusted by teams of all sizes, including Comcast and Doordash. Want to see Starburst in action? Go to dataengineeringpodcast.com/starburst and get $500 in credits to try Starburst Galaxy today, the easiest and fastest way to get started using Trino. Your host is Tobias Macey and today I'm interviewing Dipti Borkar about her work on Microsoft Fabric and performing analytics on data withou

Interview

Introduction How did you get involved in the area of data management? Can you describe what Microsoft Fabric is and the story behind it? Data lakes in various forms have been gaining significant popularity as a unified interface to an organization's analytics. What are the motivating factors that you see for that trend? Microsoft has been investing heavily in open source in recent years, and the Fabric platform relies on several open components. What are the benefits of layering on top of existing technologies rather than building a fully custom solution?

What are the elements of Fabric that were engineered specifically for the service? What are the most interesting/complicated integration challenges?

How has your prior experience with Ahana and Presto informed your current work at Microsoft? AI plays a substantial role in the product. What are the benefits of embedding Copilot into the data engine?

What are the challenges in terms of safety and reliability?

What are the most interesting, innovative, or unexpected ways that you have seen the Fabric platform used? What are the most interesting, unexpected, or challenging lessons that you have learned while working on data lakes generally, and Fabric specifically? When is Fabric the wrong choice? What do you have planned for the future of data lake analytics?

Contact Info

LinkedIn

Parting Question

From your perspective, what is the biggest gap in the tooling or technology for data management today?

Closing Announcements

Thank you for listening! Don't forget to check out our other shows. Podcast.init covers the Python language, its community, and the innovative ways it is being used. The Machine Learning Podcast helps you go from idea to production with machine learning. Visit the site to subscribe to the show, sign up for the mailing list, and read the show notes. If you've learned something or tried out a project from the show then tell us about it! Email [email protected] with your story.

Links

Microsoft Fabric Ahana episode DB2 Distributed Spark Presto Azure Data MAD Landscape

Podcast Episode ML Podcast Episode

Tableau dbt Medallion Architecture Microsoft Onelake ORC Parquet Avro Delta Lake Iceberg

Podcast Episode

Hudi

Podcast Episode

Hadoop PowerBI

Podcast Episode

Velox Gluten Apache XTable GraphQL Formula 1 McLaren

The intro and outro music is from The Hug by The Freak Fandango Orchestra / CC BY-SA Sponsored By: Starburst:

This episode is brought to you by Starburst - an end-to-end data lakehouse platform for data engineers who are battling to build and scale high quality data pipelines on the data lake. Powered by T

Summary

Stripe is a company that relies on data to power their products and business. To support that functionality they have invested in Trino and Iceberg for their analytical workloads. In this episode Kevin Liu shares some of the interesting features that they have built by combining those technologies, as well as the challenges that they face in supporting the myriad workloads that are thrown at this layer of their data platform.

Announcements

Hello and welcome to the Data Engineering Podcast, the show about modern data management Data lakes are notoriously complex. For data engineers who battle to build and scale high quality data workflows on the data lake, Starburst is an end-to-end data lakehouse platform built on Trino, the query engine Apache Iceberg was designed for, with complete support for all table formats including Apache Iceberg, Hive, and Delta Lake. Trusted by teams of all sizes, including Comcast and Doordash. Want to see Starburst in action? Go to dataengineeringpodcast.com/starburst and get $500 in credits to try Starburst Galaxy today, the easiest and fastest way to get started using Trino. Your host is Tobias Macey and today I'm interviewing Kevin Liu about his use of Trino and Iceberg for Stripe's data lakehouse

Interview

Introduction How did you get involved in the area of data management? Can you describe what role Trino and Iceberg play in Stripe's data architecture?

What are the ways in which your job responsibilities intersect with Stripe's lakehouse infrastructure?

What were the requirements and selection criteria that led to the selection of that combination of technologies?

What are the other systems that feed into and rely on the Trino/Iceberg service?

what kinds of questions are you answering with table metadata

what use case/team does that support

comparative utility of iceberg REST catalog What are the shortcomings of Trino and Iceberg? What are the most interesting, innovative, or unexpected ways that you have seen Iceberg/Trino used? What are the most interesting, unexpected, or challenging lessons that you have learned while working on Stripe's data infrastructure? When is a lakehouse on Trino/Iceberg the wrong choice? What do you have planned for the future of Trino and Iceberg at Stripe?

Contact Info

Substack LinkedIn

Parting Question

From your perspective, what is the biggest gap in the tooling or technology for data management today?

Closing Announcements

Thank you for listening! Don't forget to check out our other shows. Podcast.init covers the Python language, its community, and the innovative ways it is being used. The Machine Learning Podcast helps you go from idea to production with machine learning. Visit the site to subscribe to the show, sign up for the mailing list, and read the show notes. If you've learned something or tried out a project from the show then tell us about it! Email [email protected] with your story.

Links

Trino Iceberg Stripe Spark Redshift Hive Metastore Python Iceberg Python Iceberg REST Catalog Trino Metadata Table Flink

Podcast Episode

Tabular

Podcast Episode

Delta Table

Podcast Episode

Databricks Unity Catalog Starburst AWS Athena Kevin Trinofest Presentation Alluxio

Podcast Episode

Parquet Hudi Trino Project Tardigrade Trino On Ice

The intro and outro music is from The Hug by The Freak Fandango Orchestra / CC BY-SA Sponsored By: Starburst:

This episode is brought to you by Starburst - an end-to-end data lakehouse platform for data engineers who are battling to build and scale high quality data pipelines on the data lake. Powered by Trino, the query engine Apache Iceberg was designed for, Starburst is an open platform with support for all table formats including Apache Iceberg, Hive, and Delta Lake.

Trusted by the teams at Comcast and Doordash, Starburst del

Summary

Streaming data processing enables new categories of data products and analytics. Unfortunately, reasoning about stream processing engines is complex and lacks sufficient tooling. To address this shortcoming Datorios created an observability platform for Flink that brings visibility to the internals of this popular stream processing system. In this episode Ronen Korman and Stav Elkayam discuss how the increased understanding provided by purpose built observability improves the usefulness of Flink.

Announcements

Hello and welcome to the Data Engineering Podcast, the show about modern data management This episode is supported by Code Comments, an original podcast from Red Hat. As someone who listens to the Data Engineering Podcast, you know that the road from tool selection to production readiness is anything but smooth or straight. In Code Comments, host Jamie Parker, Red Hatter and experienced engineer, shares the journey of technologists from across the industry and their hard-won lessons in implementing new technologies. I listened to the recent episode "Transforming Your Database" and appreciated the valuable advice on how to approach the selection and integration of new databases in applications and the impact on team dynamics. There are 3 seasons of great episodes and new ones landing everywhere you listen to podcasts. Search for "Code Commentst" in your podcast player or go to dataengineeringpodcast.com/codecomments today to subscribe. My thanks to the team at Code Comments for their support. Data lakes are notoriously complex. For data engineers who battle to build and scale high quality data workflows on the data lake, Starburst is an end-to-end data lakehouse platform built on Trino, the query engine Apache Iceberg was designed for, with complete support for all table formats including Apache Iceberg, Hive, and Delta Lake. Trusted by teams of all sizes, including Comcast and Doordash. Want to see Starburst in action? Go to dataengineeringpodcast.com/starburst and get $500 in credits to try Starburst Galaxy today, the easiest and fastest way to get started using Trino. Your host is Tobias Macey and today I'm interviewing Ronen Korman and Stav Elkayam about pulling back the curtain on your real-time data streams by bringing intuitive observability to Flink streams

Interview

Introduction How did you get involved in the area of data management? Can you describe what Datorios is and the story behind it? Data observability has been gaining adoption for a number of years now, with a large focus on data warehouses. What are some of the unique challenges posed by Flink?

How much of the complexity is due to the nature of streaming data vs. the architectural realities of Flink?

How has the lack of visibility into the flow of data in Flink impacted the ways that teams think about where/when/how to apply it? How have the requirements of generative AI shifted the demand for streaming data systems?

What role does Flink play in the architecture of generative AI systems?

Can you describe how Datorios is implemented?

How has the design and goals of Datorios changed since you first started working on it?

How much of the Datorios architecture and functionality is specific to Flink and how are you thinking about its potential application to other streaming platforms? Can you describe how Datorios is used in a day-to-day workflow for someone building streaming applications on Flink? What are the most interesting, innovative, or unexpected ways that you have seen Datorios used? What are the most interesting, unexpected, or challenging lessons that you have learned while working on Datorios? When is Datorios the wrong choice? What do you have planned for the future of Datorios?

Contact Info

Ronen

LinkedIn

Stav

LinkedIn

Parting Question

From your perspective, what is the biggest gap in the tooling or technology for data management today?

Closing Announcements

Thank you for listening! Don't forget to